Industrial Court Warns NUJ Against Proceeding With 2024 Election Amid Legal Dispute

Industrial Court Warns NUJ Against Proceeding With 2024 Election Amid Legal Dispute

 

The National Industrial Court, Abuja Division, has cautioned the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) against proceeding with its 8th Triennial Delegates Conference, scheduled for November 26–28, 2024. The court advised the union to delay the election until the resolution of a legal dispute brought by an aggrieved member, Mr. Olayinka Abdulwaheed Adubi.

Adubi, a member of the Kaduna State Council of the NUJ, filed a lawsuit seeking to restrain the NUJ President, Christopher Isiguzo, from allegedly attempting to extend the tenure of the Central Working Committee (CWC). The tenure of the CWC reportedly expired on October 6, 2024.

Allegations Against NUJ Leadership  

The claimant accused Isiguzo of deliberately refusing to constitute an Election Credentials Committee, a move he argues is aimed at facilitating a tenure elongation plan. Adubi contends that this action violates the provisions of the NUJ Constitution.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Adubi’s counsel urged the court to prevent the NUJ from taking actions that could undermine its authority or preempt its ruling.

Court’s Warning and Adjournment  

Justice Olufunke Anuwe, the presiding judge, cautioned the NUJ to await the court’s decision before proceeding with the planned election. The court has scheduled December 13, 2024, for its ruling on the matter.

The judge emphasized the importance of maintaining the status quo, noting that any attempt by the union to move forward with the election would amount to self-help and could risk nullification of the process.

Legal Perspectives on the Case  

Speaking after the session, the claimant’s counsel, Barrister Sarafa Yusuff, warned that proceeding with the election would be a risky violation of the court’s caution. He stated, “With the court’s position, it is clear that the NUJ should not proceed further until the case is resolved. Any violation could result in serious consequences.”

Similarly, Barrister Chugbo Enwezor, a seasoned legal practitioner and former member of the Anambra State House of Assembly, explained that the court’s pronouncement serves as an implicit injunction.

“The court’s advice is as binding as an injunction,” Enwezor said. “Once a matter is before a court, all parties must refrain from any action that could preempt the court’s decision. If the election proceeds, it will be deemed an act of self-help, and the court could nullify it.”

Implications for the NUJ  

The NUJ now faces the challenge of complying with the court’s caution while ensuring the integrity of its leadership and electoral process. The case has drawn significant attention, highlighting concerns over adherence to constitutional provisions and transparency within the union.

The December 13 ruling is expected to provide clarity on the legal dispute and determine the next steps for the union’s leadership and electoral process.

Share This

COMMENTS

Wordpress (0)
Disqus (0 )