Court Reschedules Trial Of Chioma Okoli Over Erisco Foods Controversy
The Federal High Court in Abuja has postponed the trial of Chioma Okoli, who faces charges related to her online commentary about Erisco Foods Limited’s tomato paste. The case, originally scheduled for hearing on Wednesday, December 4, 2024, was deferred to February 10, 2025, due to the Federal High Court’s New Legal Year event and the ongoing judges’ conference.
Presiding over the case, Justice Peter Lifu could not sit, leading to the adjournment of the proceedings.
Chioma Okoli first appeared in court on May 28, 2024, when she was arraigned on two counts linked to allegations of cybercrime under the Cybercrime Act, 2015. She pleaded not guilty to the charges. After spending a few days in a correctional facility, Okoli was granted bail on May 31, with conditions set at N5 million and two sureties.
The charges stem from a Facebook post made by Okoli on September 17, 2023, in which she shared her dissatisfaction with Erisco Foods’ Nagiko Tomato Mix, describing it as “utterly sugary.” She mentioned her preference for Gino and Sonia brands but noted that they were unavailable at the time of her purchase.
The post went viral, sparking public reactions and prompting Erisco Foods Limited to file a formal petition with the Inspector-General of Police. The company alleged that Okoli’s comments violated laws governing cyberspace and requested an investigation.
The controversy also brought increased scrutiny of Erisco Foods’ operations. The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) revisited the registration details of the Nagiko Tomato Mix, initially inspected in 2021, to ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
Okoli’s trial is now set for February 10, 2025, with proceedings expected to focus on whether her online commentary constituted a violation of the Cybercrime Act. The outcome is anticipated to provide clarity on the limits of consumer expression in the digital age and its intersection with corporate reputation.
The case continues to generate public interest, especially concerning freedom of speech, consumer rights, and corporate accountability in Nigeria.
