Court Grants Activist Olamide Thomas ₦10 Million Bail With Strict Conditions For Alleged Insults Against Tinubu’s Son, Top Police Officials

Court Grants Activist Olamide Thomas ₦10 Million Bail With Strict Conditions For Alleged Insults Against Tinubu’s Son, Top Police Officials

 

 

A Federal High Court in Abuja has granted bail to human rights activist Olamide Thomas, detained over allegations of insulting President Bola Tinubu’s son, Seyi, and top police officials, including Inspector General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun and Police Public Relations Officer Muyiwa Adejobi, in a viral social media post.

Justice Emeka Nwite, delivering the ruling on Monday, set bail at ₦10 million with stringent conditions. Thomas is required to provide one surety in the same amount, alongside meeting additional criteria, including:

  • A three-year tax clearance certificate from the surety.
  • Proof that the surety resides within the court’s jurisdiction.
  • Submission of two recent passport photographs and an affidavit of means.
  • Verification of the surety’s address by court authorities.

The court determined there was insufficient evidence to suggest Thomas would evade trial if granted bail. The trial has been adjourned to February 18, 2025.

The case, referenced as F/HE/ARS/CR/636/2024, lists the Inspector General of Police as the complainant. During Monday’s hearing, Thomas’ legal team, led by Dr. S. M. Oyeghe and J. A. Ekwe, presented the bail application, while the prosecution was notably absent.

Nigerian human rights activist Omoyele Sowore reacted to the ruling on social media, criticizing the stringent bail conditions as oppressive.
“Nurse Olamide was granted bail this morning in Abuja. Though the conditions were stringent and unduly oppressive, we will keep fighting Nigeria’s Police Force abuse and irresponsible conduct!” Sowore wrote on his X handle.

Thomas is accused of making defamatory statements against Seyi Tinubu, IGP Kayode Egbetokun, and PRO Muyiwa Adejobi, sparking charges that have drawn widespread criticism from human rights advocates.

The case highlights ongoing concerns about freedom of expression and the perceived misuse of legal processes in Nigeria.

Share This

COMMENTS

Wordpress (0)
Disqus (0 )