OpenAI Faces Lawsuit In India Over Alleged Copyright Infringement
OpenAI, the creator of the widely popular ChatGPT, is facing a legal battle in India over allegations of unauthorized use of copyrighted content. The lawsuit, filed by Asian News International (ANI), one of India’s largest news agencies, accuses OpenAI of using its content to train AI models without permission.
ANI’s 287-page complaint, filed in the Delhi High Court, raises concerns about the potential for AI-generated misinformation and false attributions, with the news agency claiming that such practices could harm its reputation and disrupt public order. The case includes examples of alleged fabricated interviews by ChatGPT, such as a fictional conversation with opposition leader Rahul Gandhi.
This is the first time an Indian media organization has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI, marking a significant moment in the evolving relationship between AI technology and intellectual property law.
During the hearing, Justice Amit Bansal issued a summons to OpenAI but declined to grant an injunction, citing the complexity of the issues. OpenAI’s counsel, Amit Sibal, argued that factual information is not protected under copyright law and highlighted that websites can opt out of data collection. OpenAI also claimed the case lacked jurisdiction as its servers are not located in India. ANI’s lawyer, Sidhant Kumar, countered by asserting that public availability of content does not grant OpenAI the right to exploit it.
In a statement to TechCrunch, OpenAI expressed its commitment to working with news organizations globally, including India, to develop constructive partnerships and address concerns. OpenAI also confirmed that ChatGPT no longer accesses ANI’s website.
This case is part of a growing trend of legal challenges facing OpenAI and other generative AI companies, with similar lawsuits filed in the US, Canada, and Germany. The outcome in India could have far-reaching implications, influencing how AI tools source content and comply with intellectual property laws in one of the world’s largest markets.
The next hearing in the case is scheduled for January 2025.
